UCLA's Disturbing Crackdown on Peaceful Protesters: An Injustice Unfolds

In a deeply unsettling move, UCLA is poised to penalize at least 55 students, jeopardizing years of their hard work and financial investment, which amounts to upwards of $100,000. Their alleged crime? Participating in pro-peace protests. These students now face the harrowing prospect of losing their degrees and the futures they've worked so hard to build.

Imagine the crushing weight of receiving a letter that threatens to undo everything you've achieved. Last week, that's exactly what happened to these students. The letters, reviewed by The Guardian, accuse them of violating the student code of conduct, alleging disorderly behavior and failure to comply with police dispersal orders. Assistant deans wrote that these students must attend meetings to address the allegations, warning that no degrees will be conferred until all pending allegations, sanctions, and conditions are resolved.

The administration has set a strict deadline: if students fail to schedule their meetings by June 5th or miss their appointments, holds will be placed on their records, preventing them from registering for future classes, obtaining grades, or graduating. Some students have already reported holds on their accounts, exacerbating their anxiety and uncertainty.

The enforcement of these penalties appears grossly selective. While 55 students received letters, over 200 were arrested when their encampment was dismantled, suggesting that more students might face similar threats. Astonishingly, only one counter-protester has been arrested for violent actions, and that individual was not a UCLA student. This disparity raises serious questions about the administration’s motives and the fairness of their actions.

Video footage from that night, analyzed by The New York Times, paints a different picture. Except for a brief attempt to capture a loudspeaker and a few water bottles being tossed, none of the videos indicate that the encamped protesters initiated confrontations with counter-protesters. This starkly contrasts with the UCLA administration’s portrayal of the students as violent agitators.

UCLA’s Chancellor Gene Block, in a recent congressional testimony, acknowledged that the administration should have been better prepared to manage the encampment. Despite this admission, the administration continues to defame the pro-peace protesters. The New York Times’ analysis supports the protesters’ claims of non-violence, showing no clear instances of them initiating conflict.

The current actions against the students echo a troubling trend of suppressing campus activism. Notably, the protests were part of a larger movement advocating for Palestinian rights, a cause that has historically faced significant opposition and misrepresentation. In celebrating the legacy of activists like Bill Walton, who participated in protests during his time at UCLA, it’s crucial to recognize the hypocrisy in penalizing current students for similar actions.

Bill Walton Protesting the US Invasion of Vietnam and Being Arrested by the LAPD at the Height of his College Career

The administration’s response is reminiscent of Orwellian doublespeak, where victims are portrayed as aggressors to justify punitive actions. Chancellor Block’s justification—that the presence of peace protesters incited violence from counter-protesters—is a blatant distortion of reality. The violence was perpetrated against the pro-peace students, not by them.

The financial and academic repercussions for these students are profound. Years of hard work and significant financial investment are at risk. This punitive approach not only undermines their educational journey but also sets a dangerous precedent for future activism on campus.

This situation underscores the critical importance of protecting free speech and the right to protest on college campuses. The suppression of these rights at UCLA is a reminder of the ongoing struggle for social justice and the need to support those who stand up for it.

UCLA’s attempt to silence pro-peace protesters through academic penalties is a grave injustice. It reflects a broader societal issue where activism, especially in support of marginalized communities, is often met with disproportionate and unjust retribution. As this situation unfolds, it is imperative to stand in solidarity with these students, ensuring that their rights are protected and their voices heard.

This crackdown on peaceful protest is not just a UCLA issue; it is a call to action for all who value justice, free speech, and the right to dissent.

---

---